Editorial: Aboriginal think tank calls for ‘bold’ infrastructure development in Far North

Credit: Peregrine DiamondsCredit: Peregrine Diamonds

With the new federal government having vowed in its election platform to improve the lives of Aboriginal Canadians and spend tens of billions on infrastructure projects to offset the economic downturn, it’s a perfect time for aboriginal groups to lobby governments to step up their investments in infrastructure investment in northernmost Canada.

And that’s exactly what the National Aboriginal Economic Development Board (NAEDB) is doing with its new report, “Recommendations on northern infrastructure to support economic development.”

Founded in 1990, NAEDB says its goal is to help Aboriginal Peoples in Canada become economically self-sufficient, and full participants in the Canadian economy. The NAEDB board is made up of 10 First Nations, Inuit and Métis business and community leaders from across Canada, with Clarence Louie, chief of the Osoyoos Indian Band in B.C., serving as chairperson.

The authors argue that Canada’s North is “facing a significant infrastructure deficit — one that is a major barrier to improving the quality of life in northern indigenous communities and acts as the predominant barrier to economic and business development in the region.” (They define the “North” as the three territories and the northernmost reaches of Quebec and Labrador.)

Further, they state “bold investment in large, nation-building infrastructure” is required alongside more investment in local-level infrastructure to support Northern communities, and that indigenous peoples “must be engaged as true partners” along the way.

They lament that the North missed out on the political drive of decades past that resulted in such government-funded mega-projects as the St. Lawrence Seaway, the National Highway System, national railways, ports and airports.

The NAEDB estimates that infrastructure costs in the North are 150% higher than in the rest of Canada. They cite a recent study by the Mining Association of Canada that building a mine in the North costs up to 2.5 times more than in the south, with operating costs 30–60% higher.

But, based its past studies of northern infrastructure, the board claims that each dollar spent on Northern economic infrastructure can, if invested wisely, generate $11 of economic benefits for individuals and $11 of fiscal benefits for governments.

To boil it down, the NAEDB argues it’s time for a far more coordinated approach to infrastructure development in the North, and that governments, with their longer time horizons and lower borrowing costs, are best-suited to making these investments.

The Public-Private Partnership programs that are so popular in Southern Canada — best exemplified by Infrastructure Canada’s centrepiece, $14-billion New Building Canada Fund — are not as well-suited to the North, the authors argue, due to the daunting scale of needed investment and the North’s sparse population density, which often excludes the region from being considered under most programs’ investment formulas.

Yet the NAEDB recognizes the importance of getting private money indirectly involved in infrastructure spending in the North by buying the long-term bonds governments have created to fund infrastructure building. Private investors will also probably remain more vigilant that money is being well-spent by governments as the infrastructure projects proceed.

Another new but growing source of funds for these infrastructure-related investments are the various indigenous-development corporations set up in the wake of land claims being settled across much of the North. These corporations are essentially the economic and business development arms of aboriginal governments. An example is Makivik Corp., which represents the Inuit of Nunavik and has a net worth of $180 million, and owns six subsidiary businesses, including a regional airline and a construction company.

The NAEDB sees the First Nations Finance Authority (FNFA) as another good model. The FNFA is a not-for-profit organization under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act that provides investment and capital-planning advice, and access to long-term loans with low interest rates. The authors note that in 2013, the FNFA obtained an A3 credit rating from Moody’s, and issued its first bond of $90 million, “representing a major breakthrough for member First Nations.” Twenty-three First Nations now participate, and last July another $50 million was added to the bond, with proceeds used by First Nations for community infrastructure, housing and economic development projects.


1 Comment on "Editorial: Aboriginal think tank calls for ‘bold’ infrastructure development in Far North"

  1. David E.H. Smith | February 3, 2016 at 4:02 pm | Reply

    But, Under what Circumstances would Native Canadians consider helping non-Native Canadians, et al, to Co-Sue the Federal Government & Corporate Canada, et al, for Deprivation of Due Diligence Info, besides Ending the ‘Designer Racism’ & other considerations?

    Corporate Canada & executives of their Big 3 political parties ‘forgot’ to tell its Global Corporate associates; promoters of TPP, CETA, C-CIT, et al, that they can not & will not be able to supersede Native Human rights, consultations, et al. Proof of Good intentions in Prior, During & Follow-up Discussions Needed for ‘Foreign’ Treaties/’Arrangements’ with Vast Modifications prior to Implementation, or, Rejection. Anything besides Schedule of Tariff Reductions needs Native Approval?
    How much Money (Shares & Dividends) are the Most Vulnerable Band Members going to Get from their Economic Enterprises vs. Continued High Salaries for ‘Leaders’?
    • Global Corporate Associates have been ‘Passing’ Lobbied Legislation in Anticipation of Suing Once Ratified. ‘Trickle’ Up Economics.
    • Reconciliation between Native & non Native Canadians And the Political Parties of Canada, Corporate Canada (& its Assocs.) & the Potential Shareholders, et al; need to Re-opening Treaties to Live up to Terms of WAD Accord. Remorseless P.M. Trudeau Continuing to Blame & Punish those that have been Deliberately Deprived of the Relevant Info. creates ‘difficulties’ for an apology from Pope Francis & other Religious leaders.
    • Corp. Canada Continues to Create Unrealistic Expectations for Global Treaty Signatories via Deprivation of Due Diligence Info. Re; WAD Accord’s 2X+ Direct Cash Dividends, Compensation, etc.

    • Eco. Dev. Contracts VOIDED at Shareholders’ Expense for Trampling over ‘Consultation’ with the Most Vulnerable Band Members (95% – 99% of the Band Members) & Desecrating The W.A.D. Accord & its Compensation?
    * Still NO MONEY for Sharing, Discussing & Improving The WAD Accord & its COMPENSATION in SAFE Forums; TPP, CETA corporations & SHAREHOLDERS brace for “You Should have Known’ Routine?

    • Will Native & non Native Leaders Continue to Deprive the Most Vulnerable Community Members of the Info re; Businesses, Industries, Enterprises that Can Provide Factor 2X+ Cash Dividends. Poverty is the Only ‘Guarantee’?
    • Corporate Canada, Bay St., Parliament Insist upon Deluding; the most vulnerable Canadians, both Native & non Native (95% – 99% of all Canadians) and Global Corporate Assocs. ‘Ignoramus at Ignorambimus’?

    (CAN) But, how much of the direct cash dividends are the most vulnerable band members obtaining from their share of ‘their’ economic development as per The W.A.D. Accord & its Compensation? Are the most vulnerables receiving a factor of two (2+) of the amount that can be obtained from all of the present sources of social assistance? Or, are the band managers claiming that the most vulnerables are obtaining “more benefits(?) than any other Native community”, or, are the rights of the most vulnerable First Nations members (ie. 95% – 99% of the members of the communities) once again being traded for future considerations that only benefit the families of the 1% – 5% of the communities?

    And, how anxious is corporate Canada to make ‘arrangements’ with Native leaders that would avoid the time consuming process of re-opening existing treaties to include the provisions of The WAD Accord & its Compensation, and/or, of including the provisions in the treaties that are presently being negotiated in order that corporate Canada can ‘guarantee’ its global corporate associates that they will not be further encumbered by the development of Indigenous (human) rights & thus, …

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, click more information

Dear user, please be aware that we use cookies to help users navigate our website content and to help us understand how we can improve the user experience. If you have ideas for how we can improve our services, we’d love to hear from you. Click here to email us. By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy & Cookie Usage Policy to learn more.